Simultaneous Localization Mapping and Navigation Accuracy in Indoor Service Robots

Authors

  • Noah Berger Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Author

Keywords:

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping, Autonomous Navigation, Sensor Validation, Indoor Robotics, Error Propagation

Abstract

The widespread deployment of indoor service robots relies heavily on their ability to autonomously navigate complex, dynamic, and unstructured environments. Central to this autonomous capability is the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping framework, which provides the spatial awareness necessary for safe path planning and execution. While significant algorithmic advancements have been made in spatial mapping, a critical gap remains in understanding the precise quantitative relationship between mapping accuracy, driven by underlying sensor fidelity, and the ultimate navigation performance of the robotic platform. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the direct linkages between sensor-level validation, mapping degradation, and navigation execution errors. Through a comprehensive experimental methodology utilizing a custom-built differential drive service robot equipped with heterogeneous sensors, including light detection and ranging, visual cameras, and inertial measurement units, we systematically evaluate how sensor noise, calibration errors, and environmental challenges propagate through the spatial mapping pipeline into the navigation stack. The study utilizes highly controlled indoor environments combined with motion capture ground truth to isolate and quantify these error propagations. The findings reveal that even marginal degradation in mapping fidelity due to sensor limitations exponentially increases trajectory deviations during autonomous navigation, particularly in feature-deprived or highly dynamic spaces. By validating the sensor inputs and correlating them with navigation outcomes, this research provides a robust empirical framework for optimizing sensor selection and algorithmic tuning in indoor service robotics, ultimately enhancing their reliability and operational safety.

References

1. European Union (EU).

2025. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/one-health/overview_en (accessed on 21 November 2025).

2. Ismail, A.A.; Khalifa, N.E.; El-Khoribi, R.A. A Survey on Resource Scheduling Approaches in Multi-Access Edge Computing Environment: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Study. Clust. Comput. 2025, 28, 184.

3. Suzuki, T.; Matsuda, K.; Kumagae, K.; Tobisawa, M.; Hoshino, J.; Itoh, Y.; Harada, T.; Matsuoka, J.; Kagawa, T.; Hattori, K. Acquisition of cooperative control of multiple vehicles through reinforcement learning utilizing vehicle-to-vehicle communication and map information. J. Robot. Mechatron. 2024, 36, 642–657.

4. Lu, M.; Taiebat, M.; Xu, M.; Hsu, S.C. Multiagent spatial simulation of autonomous taxis for urban commute: Travel economics and environmental impacts. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2018, 144, 04018033.

5. Zhou, L. The differentiated development dilemmas and governance strategies of provincial childcare institutions in China—Empirical research based on 1,272 childcare institutions in Hunan province. Stud. Early Child. Educ. 2025, 24–35.

6. Shen, Y.; Xie, L.; Li, M. Intelligent Path Selection Algorithm for Tactical Communication Networks Enhanced by Link State Awareness. Front. Commun. Netw. 2025, 6, 1635982.

7. Chen, L. (2024). An extended TF-IDF method for improving keyword extraction in traditional corpus-based research: An example of a climate change corpus. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 153, 102322.

8. Moreno, C. The 15-Minute City: A Solution for Saving Our Time & Our Planet; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2024.

9. World Health Organization (WHO).

2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/one-health (accessed on 22 November 2025).

10. Yang, X.; Recker, W.W. Modelling dynamic vehicle navigation in a self-organizing, peer-to-peer, distributed traffic information system. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2006, 10, 185–204.

11. Pearce, J. M. (2022). The rise of platinum open access journals with both impact factors and zero article processing charges. Knowledge, 2(2), 209–224.

12. Lowe, R.; Wu, Y.; Tamar, A.; Harb, J.; Abbeel, P.; Mordatch, I. Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NeurIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 December 2017; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 6379–6390.

13. Shen, L.; Li, B.; Zhu, X. Robust Offloading for Edge Computing-Assisted Sensing and Communication Systems: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. Sensors 2024, 24, 2489.

14. Zhou, L. Structural contradictions and policy suggestions on generally beneficial childcare service for 0~3-year-old infants and young children in China—Based on statistical data and survey analysis in Hunan Province. Stud. Early Child. Educ. 2023, 51–60.

15. Su, W.; Liu, H.; Li, T.; Lv, X.; Rui, H.; Huang, W.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y. Jointly Optimizing Deployment and Antenna of Base Stations Using Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 2026, 20, 1–25.

16. Dey, K.C.; Rayamajhi, A.; Chowdhury, M.; Bhavsar, P.; Martin, J. Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication in a heterogeneous wireless network: Performance evaluation. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 68, 168–184.

17. May, C.; Finch, T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 2009, 43, 535–554.

18. May, C.R.; Mair, F.; Finch, T.; MacFarlane, A.; Dowrick, C.; Treweek, S.; Rapley, T.; Ballini, L.; Ong, B.N.; Rogers, A.; et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization process theory. Implement. Sci. 2009, 4, 29–37.

19. Takai, I.; Harada, T.; Andoh, M.; Yasutomi, K.; Kagawa, K.; Kawahito, S. Optical vehicle-to-vehicle communication system using LED transmitter and camera receiver. IEEE Photonics J. 2014, 6, 1–14.

20. Butkus, M.; Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, A.; Matuzevičiūtė, K. Heterogeneous growth outcomes of the EU’s regional financial support mediated by institutions with some empirical evidences at NUTS 3 level. Rev. Reg. Res. 2019, 40, 33–66.

21. Wang, T.; Cheng, K.; Du, X. Multi-Agent Independent PPO-Based Automatic ECN Tuning for High-Speed Data Center Networks. In Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), Edinburgh, UK, 2–5 September 2025; pp. 1–11.

22. Mahmassani, H.S.; Jayakrishnan, R. System performance and user response under real-time information. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 1991, 25, 293–307.

23. Latreche, S.; Bellahsene, H. A Comprehensive Survey on 6G: Enabling Technologies, Key Applications, and Future Challenges. Frankl. Open 2026, 15, 100559.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

Issue

Section

Articles