Impedance Control Strategies for Rehabilitation Safety in Wearable Assistive Exoskeletons: Comparative Analysis
Keywords:
Impedance Control, Wearable Exoskeletons, Rehabilitation Safety, Human-Robot Interaction, Comparative AnalysisAbstract
The integration of wearable assistive exoskeletons in rehabilitation protocols has introduced paradigm-shifting capabilities for motor recovery in neurologically impaired patients. Central to the clinical efficacy of these robotic systems is the control architecture governing the physical interaction between the human operator and the machine. This paper presents a comprehensive academic investigation into impedance control strategies, specifically evaluating their impact on rehabilitation safety and interactive compliance. As traditional rigid position control mechanisms frequently compromise patient safety by applying excessive interaction forces during human-robot misalignment, impedance control has emerged as a fundamental solution. By modulating the dynamic relationship between position errors and interaction forces, impedance controllers provide a compliant interface that accommodates human volition and physiological limitations. This study systematically compares fixed impedance control and variable impedance control paradigms through a rigorous methodological framework. The analysis encompasses kinematic tracking accuracy, dynamic force modulation, and stringent rehabilitation safety criteria, including the mitigation of spasticity-induced joint torque overloads. Through detailed simulated experimental evaluations, the findings demonstrate that adaptive and variable impedance control architectures significantly enhance patient safety by reducing peak transient forces while maintaining therapeutically adequate trajectory tracking. The paper concludes by discussing the clinical implications of these control strategies, addressing implementation challenges, and outlining future trajectories for the development of safe, intelligent, and highly compliant wearable assistive exoskeletons.References
1. Patton, M.Q. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qual. Soc. Work 2002, 1, 261–283.
2. Safitra, M.F.; Lubis, M.; Kurniawan, M.T.; Alhari, M.I.; Nuraliza, H.; Azzahra, S.F.; Putri, D.P. Green Networking: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Trends for Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the 2023 11th International Conference on Computer and Communications Management, Nagoya Japan, 4–6 August 2023; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 168–173.
3. Hu, H.; Tang, H.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, F.; Ding, Z.; Niyato, D. Joint Scheduling and Power Control in AoI-Oriented WP-IoT Networks: An HVF-Based PPO Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2025, 75, 6876–6881.
4. Meng, M.; Hu, B.; Chen, S.; Kang, S. Joint Beamforming and Dynamic Beam Hopping Based on MAPPO for LEO Satellite Communication System. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2025, 14, 1461–1465.
5. Wu, K.; Wang, Z.; Chen, S.-L.; Zhang, J.A.; Guo, Y.J. ISAC: From Human to Environmental Sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Electromagn. Antennas Propag. 2025, 1, 84–98.
6. Geng, J.; Jiu, B.; Li, K.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, H. Joint Optimization of Frequency Selection and Transmit Power for Radar Anti-Jamming using Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), Zhoushan, China, 21–23 September 2024.
7. Ma, F.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Wu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, L.; Aksun-Guvenc, B.; Guvenc, L. Eco-driving-based cooperative adaptive cruise control of connected vehicles platoon at signalized intersections. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 92, 102746.
8. Gou, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, K.; Yin, C. Current situation and optimization strategies of childcare service demand of parents of children aged 0–3 years—Analysis based on the Kano model. Stud. Early Child. Educ. 2024, 54–72.
9. Milanés, V.; Shladover, S.E.; Spring, J.; Nowakowski, C.; Kawazoe, H.; Nakamura, M. Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014, 15, 296–305.
10. Li, Y.; Shan, C. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control links on driving comfort under vehicle-to-vehicle communication. J. Adv. Transp. 2022, 2022, 7248854.
11. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176.
12. Ericsson. EMR June 2025 Highlights Growing Monetization Appeal of 5G Fixed Wireless Access.
2025. Available online: https://www.ericsson.com/en/press-releases/2025/6/emr-june-2025-highlights-growing-monetization-appeal-of-5g-fixed-wireless-access (accessed on 24 June 2026).
13. Charani, E.; Castro-Sánchez, E.; Moore, L.S.; Holmes, A. Do smartphone applications in healthcare require a governance and legal framework? It depends on the application! BMC Med. 2014, 12, 29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.