Coordination Latency under Multi-Robot Communication in Factory Transport Systems: Protocol Evaluation

Authors

  • Miki Nakamura Division of Human Mechanical Systems and Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaidô, Japan Author
  • Leon Frank Faculty 4 Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany Author
  • Miki Nakagawa Division of Human Mechanical Systems and Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaidô, Japan Author

Keywords:

Multi-Robot Systems, Communication Protocols, Latency Evaluation, Factory Automation, Multi-Robot Communication

Abstract

The rapid paradigm shift toward Industry 4.0 has fundamentally transformed traditional manufacturing floors into highly dynamic cyber physical systems. Central to this transformation is the deployment of multi robot systems for automated material handling and logistics. As these transport systems scale in size and complexity, the efficiency of their operations becomes critically dependent on the underlying communication protocols that facilitate inter robot coordination and fleet management. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of communication and coordination latency across various industrial protocols utilized in multi robot factory transport systems. By systematically analyzing the performance of publish subscribe architectures, client server models, and decentralized data distribution services, this study isolates the critical factors contributing to network latency, jitter, and packet loss in high density robotic environments. We investigate how varying payload sizes, transmission frequencies, and network topologies impact the real time responsiveness required for collision avoidance, path planning, and task allocation. Furthermore, the evaluation provides an in depth analysis of edge computing integration and its role in mitigating queuing delays during peak operational loads. The findings offer crucial insights for industrial engineers and system architects, highlighting the trade offs between protocol overhead, reliability, and synchronization accuracy, thereby guiding the future design of scalable and deterministic communication frameworks for next generation autonomous factory operations.

References

1. Levinson, D. The Value of Advanced Traveler Information Systems for Route Choice. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2003, 11, 75–87.

2. Asian Development Bank. Reducing Carbon Emissions from Transport Projects; Evaluation Study No. EKB: REG 2010-16; Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines, 2010.

3. Lianghai, J.; Liu, M.; Weinand, A.; Schotten, H.D. Direct vehicle-to-vehicle communication with infrastructure assistance in 5G network. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), Budva, Montenegro, 28–30 June 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–5.

4. Louati, A.; Louati, H.; Kariri, E.; Neifar, W.; Hassan, M.K.; Khairi, M.H.H.; Farahat, M.A.; El-Hoseny, H.M. Sustainable Smart Cities through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning-Based Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1779.

5. Singh, R.; Kaushik, A.; Shin, W.; Renzo, M.D.; Sciancalepore, V.; Lee, D.; Sasaki, H.; Shojaeifard, A.; Dobre, O.A. Toward 6G Evolution: Three Enhancements, Three Innovations, and Three Major Challenges. IEEE Netw. 2025, 39, 139–147.

6. Espinosa, A.; Samos, X.; Ulied, D.; Marias, J.; Touma, R. Optimizing Energy Consumption of Edge-Cloud Environments: A Comparative Study Between PPO and PSO. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2025, 19, 16.

7. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, N.D.; Nahavandi, S. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multiagent Systems: A Review of Challenges, Solutions, and Applications. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2020, 50, 3826–3839.

8. Youn, H.; Gastner, M.T.; Jeong, H. Price of anarchy in transportation networks: Efficiency and optimality control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 128701.

9. García-Pineda, V.; Valencia-Arias, A.; Patiño-Vanegas, J.C.; Flores Cueto, J.J.; Arango-Botero, D.; Rojas Coronel, A.M.; Rodríguez-Correa, P.A. Research Trends in the Use of Machine Learning Applied in Mobile Networks: A Bibliometric Approach and Research Agenda. Informatics 2023, 10, 73.

10. Yang, L.; Bi, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, R. Resource Allocation for SFC Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th World Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT), Chengdu, China, 12–14 April 2024; pp. 210–215.

11. Dubey, M.; Singh, A.K.; Mishra, R. AI Based Resource Management for 5G Network Slicing: History, Use Cases, and Research Directions. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2025, 37, e8327.

12. Wang, K.; Sun, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, Z. Energy-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning RSMA in Multi-UAV-Assisted Wireless-Powered Communication Network. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2026, 13, 2420–2438.

13. Sukhbaatar, S.; Szlam, A.; Fergus, R. Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29 (NeurIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 2244–2252.

14. Jiang, J.; Lu, Z. Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, QC, Canada, 3–8 December 2018; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 7265–7275.

15. Zhang, R.; Xiong, K.; Lu, Y.; Fan, P.; Ng, D.W.K.; Letaief, K.B. Energy Efficiency Maximization in RIS-Assisted SWIPT Networks With RSMA: A PPO-Based Approach. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2023, 41, 1413–1430.

16. Xu, Y.; Zhu, K.; Xu, H.; Ji, J. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Objective Resource Allocation in Multi-Platoon Cooperative Vehicular Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2023, 22, 6185–6198.

17. Reynolds, C.W. Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Technique, Anaheim, CA, USA, 27–31 July 1987; Volume 21, pp. 25–34.

18. Kahraman, İ.; Köse, A.; Koca, M.; Anarim, E. Age of Information in Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 9896–9914.

19. Ke, Z.; Wang, X.; Du, Z.; Xiong, T.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J. Intelligent frequency reuse for dynamic spectrum anti-jamming: A hybrid-reward-based multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2025, 14, 771–775.

20. Erdwins, C.J.; Buffardi, L.C. Different types of day care and their relationship to maternal satisfaction, perceived support, and role conflict. Child Youth Care Forum 1994, 23, 41–54.

21. Markets and Markets 6G Market Size & Outlook, 2030–2036.

2025. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/6g-market-213693378.html (accessed on 24 June 2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

Issue

Section

Articles