Task Acceptance in Hospital Logistics Robots Using Human-Robot Trust Cues: Agent Modeling

Authors

  • Ka-Yan Mok Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Human-Robot Interaction, Trust Cues, Agent Modeling, Hospital Logistics, Task Acceptance

Abstract

The integration of autonomous logistics robots in hospital environments has the potential to significantly alleviate the physical and cognitive workloads of healthcare professionals. However, the successful deployment of these robotic systems is heavily dependent on the level of trust established between the human workers and the robots. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into predicting task acceptance by leveraging human-robot trust cues through advanced agent modeling techniques. By analyzing implicit behavioral signals such as gaze duration, interpersonal distance, and interaction latency, this study constructs a computational agent model that continuously evaluates the psychological state of healthcare workers. The research was conducted in a highly realistic simulated hospital environment, involving nursing staff who interacted with a prototype logistics robot responsible for delivering medical supplies. The extracted behavioral features were integrated into a probabilistic framework to forecast whether a nurse would accept or reject a task delegated by or shared with the robot. The findings demonstrate a strong correlation between specific non-verbal trust cues and the likelihood of task acceptance, proving that agent-based modeling can serve as a highly accurate proxy for real-time trust assessment. The proposed system enables logistics robots to dynamically adapt their interaction strategies based on the predicted trust levels, thereby fostering a more harmonious and efficient collaborative healthcare ecosystem. The insights derived from this study provide a foundational framework for future designs of socially aware robotic systems in high-stress, safety-critical work environments.

References

1. Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(4), 195–207.

2. Tran, K.; Morra, D.; Lo, V.; Quan, S.D.; Abrams, H.; Wu, R.C. Medical students and personal smartphones in the clinical environment: The impact on confidentiality of personal health information and professionalism. J. Med. Internet Res. 2014, 16, e132.

3. Sun, A.; Wu, P.; Jin, S.; Jiao, F. Deep Reinforcement Learning-Driven Multidomain Resource Allocation for Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computing. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition (AIPR 2025), Quanzhou, China, 19–21 December 2025; Tian, H., Ed.; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2025; p. 239.

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) User Guide; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2002.

5. Moodie-Dyer, A.; Collins, K. Social work engagement in early childhood education and care advocacy and policy. Prof. Development. Int. J. Contin. Soc. Work Educ. 2013, 2, 19–30.

6. King, A.L.S.; Pádua, M.K.; Goncalves, L.L.; Santana de Souza Martins, A.; Nardi, A.E. Smartphone use by health professionals: A review. Digit. Health 2020, 6, 2055207620966860.

7. Mobasheri, M.H.; King, D.; Johnston, M.; Gautama, S.; Purkayastha, S.; Darzi, A. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: A multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015, 1, 174–181.

8. Lee, H. Functional collective action dilemma. In Handbook of Collaborative Public Management; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2021.

9. Feiock, R.C. The institutional collective action framework. Policy Stud. J. 2013, 41, 397–425.

10. Chen, L.; Wu, W.; Tian, F. Efficient Resource Allocation for RSMA-Based Semantic Image Transmission with Shared Knowledge Base. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2026, 15, 2154–2158.

11. Satyanarayanan, M. The Emergence of Edge Computing. Computer 2017, 50, 30–39.

12. Gipps, P.G. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 1981, 15, 105–111.

13. Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Du, Z.; Xu, Y.; Han, H. Lightweight reinforcement learning with state abstraction for dynamic spectrum anti-jamming communications. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 21–24 April 2024.

14. Nagel, K.; Schreckenberg, M. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. Phys. I 1992, 2, 2221–2229.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

Issue

Section

Articles