Forecasting Terrain Traversal in Legged Exploration Robots with Adaptive Locomotion Policies

Authors

  • Samuel Pang Department of Supply Chain and Information Management, School of Business, Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Legged Robotics, Adaptive Locomotion, Terrain Prediction, Comparative Analysis, Terrain Traversal

Abstract

The deployment of legged robots in unstructured and hazardous environments necessitates advanced predictive capabilities to ensure safe and efficient terrain traversal. While adaptive locomotion policies have significantly improved the robustness of legged systems in navigating complex topographies, accurately predicting the success or failure of these policies prior to physical execution remains a critical challenge. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of terrain traversal prediction methodologies derived from adaptive locomotion policies. By systematically evaluating proprioceptive and exteroceptive data streams integrated within reinforcement learning frameworks, this study identifies the latent features most indicative of traversal success across varied terrains such as gravel, mud, steep slopes, and discrete stairs. The research methodology employs a modular predictive architecture that maps the internal state representations of trained locomotion policies to external traversal outcomes. Extensive simulations demonstrate that incorporating policy specific behavioral metrics significantly enhances prediction accuracy compared to purely geometric terrain assessments. The findings suggest that the internal dynamics of adaptive policies contain implicit representations of terrain traversability, which can be extracted and utilized for high level path planning and risk mitigation. This research contributes to the broader field of autonomous exploration by bridging the gap between low level motor control and high level cognitive planning, ultimately enabling more autonomous, resilient, and intelligent legged robotic systems capable of sustained operation in unknown environments.

References

1. Puspitasari, A.A.; Lee, B.M. A Survey on Reinforcement Learning for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Wireless Communications. Sensors 2023, 23, 2554.

2. Heath, R. L., & O’Hair, H. D. (2020). Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge.

3. Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics of the European university. In P. Maassen, & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–54). Springer.

4. Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55.

5. Rajamani, R. Vehicle Dynamics and Control; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2012.

6. Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior; Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 11–39.

7. Singh, A.; Jain, T.; Sukhbaatar, S. Learning When to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Tasks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2019), New Orleans, LA, USA, 6–9 May 2019; OpenReview.net: Amherst, MA, USA, 2019.

8. Mnih, V.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Silver, D.; Rusu, A.A.; Veness, J.; Bellemare, M.G.; Graves, A.; Riedmiller, M.; Fidjeland, A.K.; Ostrovski, G.; et al. Human-Level Control through Deep Reinforcement Learning. Nature 2015, 518, 529–533.

9. Wang, J.; Ren, Z.; Liu, T.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, C. QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2021), Virtual Event, 3–7 May 2021; OpenReview.net: Amherst, MA, USA, 2021.

10. Jang, E.; Gu, S.; Poole, B. Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2017), Toulon, France, 24–26 April 2017; OpenReview.net: Amherst, MA, USA, 2017.

11. Qazzaz, M.M.H.; Salama, A.; Hafeez, M.; Zaidi, S.A.R. OREO: Open RAN Energy Optimization via Deep Reinforcement Learning for 6G Networks. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2026, 7, 4165–4182.

12. Eskandari, M.; Zhu, H.; Shojaeifard, A.; Wang, J. Statistical CSI-Based Beamforming for RIS-Aided Multiuser MISO Systems via Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2024, 13, 570–574.

13. Marzuk, F.; Vejar, A.; Chołda, P. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Energy-Efficient 6G V2X Networks. Electronics 2025, 14, 1148.

14. Chen, R.; Tan, Y. Credit Assignment with Predictive Contribution Measurement in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Neural Netw. 2023, 164, 681–690.

15. Mustafa, E.; Shuja, J.; Rehman, F.; Namoun, A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, A. Computation Offloading in Vehicular Communications Using PPO-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning. J. Supercomput. 2025, 81, 547.

16. Bengio, Y.; Léonard, N.; Courville, A. Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computation. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1308.3432.

17. Rashid, T.; Samvelyan, M.; Schroeder de Witt, C.; Farquhar, G.; Foerster, J.N.; Whiteson, S. QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018), Stockholm, Sweden, 10–15 July 2018; PMLR: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 80, pp. 4295–4304.

18. Lubell, M. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Stud. J. 2013, 41, 537–559.

19. Cerqua, A.; Pellegrini, G. I Will Survive! The Impact of Place-Based Policies When Public Transfers Fade Out; Mimeo: New York, NY, USA, 2020.

20. Hu, K.; Xu, K.; Xia, Q.; Li, M.; Song, Z.; Song, L.; Sun, N. An Overview: Attention Mechanisms in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Neurocomputing 2024, 598, 128015.

21. Nishimura, A.Z.F.C.; Au-Yong-Oliveira, M.; Sousa, M.J. ESIF Policies and Their Impact on The Development of EU Members: A Review and Research Agenda. Qual. Access Success 2021, 22, 49–63.

22. Iqbal, A.; Al-Habashna, A.; Wainer, G.; Boudreau, G.; Bouali, F. PPO-Based Energy Efficiency Maximization For RIS-Assisted Multi-User Miso Systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 100th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2024-Fall), Washington, DC, USA, 7–10 October 2024; pp. 1–6.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles