Visual Servoing Algorithms and Coordination Latency for Docking Precision in Underwater Inspection Vehicles

Authors

  • Angela Farina Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy Author

Keywords:

Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Visual Servoing, Coordination Latency, Docking Precision, Marine Robotics

Abstract

The deployment of autonomous underwater vehicles for the inspection and maintenance of subsea infrastructure has grown exponentially over the past decade. A critical requirement for the persistent operation of these vehicles is the ability to autonomously dock with submerged base stations for battery recharging and data offloading. Achieving the necessary terminal docking precision remains a formidable challenge due to the complex hydrodynamic forces, limited visibility, and inherent system delays present in the subsea environment. This paper provides a comprehensive examination of docking precision by analyzing the intersection of visual servoing algorithms and coordination latency within the control loops of underwater inspection vehicles. Visual servoing, particularly image-based visual servoing, offers high-resolution relative positioning for the terminal phase of docking but is highly susceptible to processing delays and thruster response lags. Through an extensive evaluation of latency sources including image acquisition, computational processing, and mechanical actuation, this study elucidates how coordination latency degrades the convergence stability of visual servoing controllers. Furthermore, the research investigates the dynamic coupling between visual tracking errors and hydrodynamic disturbances. The analysis demonstrates that uncompensated coordination latency fundamentally alters the error space, leading to terminal overshoot and docking failure. By systematically isolating the effects of algorithmic design and systemic delay, this paper establishes a foundational understanding of the constraints governing autonomous underwater docking, offering critical insights for the development of robust, delay-tolerant navigation strategies for next-generation marine robotics.

References

1. Rakha, H.; Ahn, K.; Trani, A. Development of VT-Micro model for estimating hot-stabilized light-duty vehicle and truck emissions. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2004, 9, 49–74.

2. Fischhoff, B., Brewer, N. T., & Downs, J. S. (2003). Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

3. Shen, M.; He, C.R.; Molnar, T.G.; Bell, A.H.; Orosz, G. Energy-efficient connected cruise control with lean penetration of connected vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 4320–4332.

4. Albanese, P.; Rauhala, A. A decade of disconnection: Child care policies in changing economic times in the Canadian context. Int. J. Child Youth Fam. Stud. 2015, 6, 252–274.

5. Alharbi, S. A Review of Deep Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Vision-Based Systems for Smart Cities. Informatica 2025, 49.

6. Peters, B.G. The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Des. Pract. 2018, 1, 1–11.

7. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.

8. Noda, Y. Intermunicipal Cooperation, Integration Forms, and Vertical and Horizontal Effects in Japan. Public Adm. Rev. 2022, 83, 654–678.

9. Lee, R.E.; Feiock, R.C. Local Government Roles in Filling the Sustainability Policy Vacuum: Insights from Local Government Managers. State Local Gov. Rev. 2020, 52, 266–276.

10. Ederveen, S.; de Groot, H.L.F.; Nahuis, R. Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy. Kyklos 2006, 59, 17–42.

11. Breidenbach, P.; Mitze, T.; Schmidt, C.M. EU Regional Policy and the Neighbour’s Curse: Analyzing the Income Convergence Effects of ESIF Funding in the Presence of Spatial Spillovers. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 2018, 57, 388–405.

12. Butkus, M.; Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, A.; Matuzevičiūtė, K. Mediating Effects of Cohesion Policy and Institutional Quality on Convergence between EU Regions: An Examination Based on a Conditional Beta-Convergence Model with a 3-Way Multiplicative Term. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3025.

13. Liu, X.; Tan, J.; Ren, X.; Dai, H. Self-Attention Proximal Policy Optimization for Beam Tracking in mmWave Communications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2026, 44, 4552–4569.

14. Treiber, M.; Hennecke, A.; Helbing, D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 1805–1824.

15. Yue, J.; Fan, X. China’s child care policy system: Review, reflection and reconstruction. China Soc. Sci. 2018, 92–111+206.

16. LeRoux, K.; Carr, J.B. Prospects for centralizing services in an urban county: Evidence from eight self-organized networks of local public services. J. Urban Aff. 2010, 32, 449–470.

17. Hegele, Y. The impact of department structure on policy-making: How portfolio combinations affect interdepartmental coordination. Public Policy Adm. 2020, 36, 429–451.

18. Di Caro, P.; Fratesi, U. One policy, different effects: Estimating the region-specific impacts of EU cohesion policy. J. Reg. Sci. 2021, 62, 307–330.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles